When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month. Subscribe to Worldcrunch

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90. Subscribe to Worldcrunch

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

Israel's Use Of White Phosphorus Will Scar Gaza For Generations

Daraj looks at the long-term deadly effects of Israeli munitions which will threaten Gaza for years after the current war ends.

Israel's Use Of White Phosphorus Will Scar Gaza For Generations

A Palestinian man holds a bucket of water to put off a fire following an Israeli bombardment.

Israa al-A’raj

-Analysis-

Israel’s war on Gaza will likely cause congenital deformities and chronic disease among Gaza residents because of Israel's use of massive quantities of explosives, missiles and internationally banned white phosphorus bombs.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

Those who survive the bombings will not be spared the long-term effects of such weapons, even if he or she is not directly wounded. Fumes in the air can permanently affect the respiratory system, and could affect the development of fetuses in the wombs of mothers who inhale these materials.

With the war in its third month, all of Gaza has become a target of Israel’s military. No place in the coastal strip is safe.

The enclave has been hit by more than 52,000 tons of Israeli explosives which have destroyed citizens’ homes, hospitals, schools, and civilian institutions, according to the director general of the government media office in Gaza, Ismail al-Thawabta.

Al-Thawabta said that there is no doubt that the Israeli army is using lethal weapons with high destructive power in this war, and is deliberately causing the greatest amount of destruction.

“It is as if it wants it to be a new Hiroshima,” he says.


Health system collapse


The U.S. pledged to provide weapons and aid to Israel worth more than $22 billion, which makes America a partner in the war, he said. The U.S. has provided tanks, planes, missiles, and bombs to the Israeli military.

Al-Thawabta says Palestinian agencies have issued warnings which aim to provide the minimum protection for citizens from exposure to the dangers of these missile emissions. Such emissions are particularly dangerous to people’s health given the collapsed health system in Gaza, he adds.

The conflict has so far killed about 20,000 people and wounded over 52,000 others in Gaza since Oct. 7. All areas of Gaza have been bombed, including the southern city of Rafah, which the Israeli military had claimed was a safe area.

Israeli denials

The Israeli military has denied using white phosphorus bombs in the ongoing war. But Amnesty International has said that the banned bombs have been used by Israel in Gaza and Lebanon, and is calling for an international investigation. The Israeli military had previously used the weapons in the 2008 war in Gaza.

Wassef Erekat, a Palestinian military expert, says Israel has used various types of bombs in its war, including the M-107 shell, which contains nearly 2,000 fragments and can spread over an area of 1,000 meters.

He also says Israel has used white phosphorus bombs, which cause phosphorus to burst in the sky before landing on the ground.

Israel has not signed the agreement and is not bound by it.

Such shells and bombs have been used in densely populated areas across Gaza, in violation of international humanitarian law (the laws of war), which requires that all feasible precautions be taken to avoid harm to civilians. The law also prohibits attacks that do not distinguish between military and civilian targets.

It is noteworthy that white phosphorus is considered an incendiary weapon under the Third Protocol to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use of Conventional Weapons. That protocol prohibits the use of incendiary weapons against military targets located among civilians. Israel has not signed the agreement and is not bound by it.

White phosphorus from an Israeli missile fired over Gaza City.

Ahmed Zakot/SOPA Images via ZUMA

Catastrophic damage

Iyad al-Jabri, the medical director of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in the central city of Deir al-Balah, exposure to phosphorous could lead to death long after active fighting ends.

“In wide areas, such bombardment causes widespread catastrophic damage to all aspects of life,” he says. “It is a toxic substance and has an impact in the short and long terms.”

It can take 30 to 40 years for the soil to recover from the chemicals.

The short-term effects include burns, especially areas in the body that are exposed to the phosphorus, he said. And in the long-term, it affects the respiratory system, liver, kidneys and heart, and can cause various types of cancer, such as leukemia.

“White phosphorus causes great risk, especially for children,” he says. “It causes immune deficiency, infections and ulcers in the mouth and severe chest infections, and may lead to death, especially of newborns, due to their weak immunity.”

Pregnant women are also exposed to great risk, including the death of fetuses, he says.

Environmental Impacts

Ahmed al-Sharida, head of the Society for Development for Man and the Environment, said that white phosphorous also affects the environment.

He says that the chemicals included in such bombs have grave impacts on the soil and lead to the death of crops and fruit trees. He says it can take 30 to 40 years for the soil to recover from the chemicals and toxic gases of white phosphorous bombs.

Such bombs also have a significant effect on water, as its chemicals interact with both hydrogen and oxygen, making the water unsuitable for either drinking or irrigation, he says.

And for sea water, it becomes more acidic, killing all marine organisms, especially fish and algae, he adds.


You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Ideas

The Eternal Dilemma Of War Photography: Between Sensitivity And Never Looking Away

There have been countless graphic images circulating of the brutal Oct. 7 attack on Israel and the seven months of bloody retribution on the people of Gaza. Yet an image where you can’t see the victim has been recognized as the Photo of the Year.

Photo of a a family fleeing Rafah, Gaza, after Israeli Defense Forces ordered the evacuation of parts of the city.

A family fleeing Rafah, Gaza, after Israeli Defense Forces ordered the evacuation of parts of the city.

Irene Caselli

PARIS — It is a haunting image: a woman dressed in blue, her head covered, holding the body of a dead child covered in a white sheet.

The photograph from Gaza by Reuters photographer Mohammed Salem won last month’s World Press Photo of the Year award, and was part of the Pulitzer Prize winning series announced Monday in the Breaking News photo category.

Taken on Oct. 17, the portrait of such an intimate moment manages to capture the enormity of a war that has consumed the Middle East and the whole world.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

When I looked more closely at the photo, I noticed the woman was wearing a denim abaya — and it was her everyday clothes that locked me into the reality that we can so easily escape by clicking away or turning the page. What I was looking at was not just an award-winning news image, not a painting or representation, neither abstract nor necessarily political.

I see a woman, probably my age, in the deepest of pain, holding a child she loves who has been killed. A child who looks to be the same size and age as my older son.

My sensitivity to such a work of photojournalism is both personal, and professional. I co-wrote a manual about how to report on children for the Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma, a U.S.-based organization for journalists who cover violence and conflict.

For both words and images, a commitment to freedom of the press does not mean carte blanche for publication is the best practice. Most experts agree, for example, that it’s best to avoid photographs of deceased people, or people in the process of dying. For children, identities and dignity should be protected with even more care.

“Images that violate the privacy of children, in my opinion, do not convey reality; instead, they fuel hatred and animosity. Such images do not stop wars,” says Jamal Saidi, former chief photographer in the Levant region at Reuters in the Children First guide.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest